« September 2005 | Main | November 2005 »
October 21, 2005
The Logic of the Atonement
I visited St John’s Latimer Square, Christchurch, on Sunday night as they celebrated the 450th Anniversary of the martyrdom of Bishops Hugh Latimer and Nicholas Ridley. The Revd Wally Behan was the preacher and he took as his theme “the Faith of the Reformers” based on Romans 3:21-26.
For me the sermon highlighted the catenation of ideas that form the basis of an evangelical understanding of the atonement (at-one-ment: a word coined by William Tyndale in his 1525 English translation of the Bible, for which he was eventually executed).
- As far as the Law is concerned, both Jew and Gentile (i.e. the whole of humanity from a bible perspective) stand universally condemned before God because of sin (Rom 3:19-20).
- However condemnation is not the only function of the Law (and indeed the Prophets), for it also attests to a more fundamental way of attaining a righteousness standing before God; that is by faith (Romans 3:21).
- Faith allows us to walk through the doorway of Christ’s redemption into a new right-standing with God: not condemned as guilty but justified as innocent (Rom 3:24).
How can this be? Surely a human judge would be dismissed for acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent? What makes us think that God has done such a thing?
- The means of this faith-based righteousness does not lie in human effort but in God’s own initiative (Rom 3:25).
- The effectiveness of Jesus’ death as an atoning sacrifice is based both on his humanity and his divinity. As one descended from David according to the flesh, Jesus stands in solidarity with our humanity. But as one declared “Son of God” by his resurrection from death, his sacrifice is of cosmic significance (Rom 1:1-4). Christ’s spotless humanity makes him a worthy sin bearer, whereas his divinity makes his sacrifice effective (Rom 3:25).
- Therefore the Gospel message demonstrates God’s righteousness in both condemning sin yet nonetheless saving sinners (Rom 3:26).
Three further things to note.
- Our understanding of the person and significance of Jesus (i.e. our Christology) is central. To deny either the full humanity or full deity of Jesus inevitably empties the cross of its power to save.
- The bodily resurrection of Jesus is crucial to the effectiveness and completeness of our salvation.
- Only those in solidarity with Christ by faith can share in his atonement. The idea of unilateral atonement is excluded.
The logic of the atonement depends on the orthodox faith of the Christian church; in God as Trinity, the virgin birth of Jesus, his bodily resurrection from the dead, and the importance of saving faith. It is therefore most appropriate for Evangelicals to make the Cross of Christ central to their thinking and living.
So-called liberalism believes none of these things and consequently has no need for the cross either. The Liberal gospel is that we are already saved; we just don’t know it yet. The Bible’s gospel tells us that we stand condemned yet God has thrown a lifeline. Which is to be believed? In whose testimony will we trust? Who is truly offering ‘Good News’? The Latimer fellowship is happy to stand with the Apostle Paul who wrote, “I am not ashamed of the gospel; it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who has faith.” (Romans 1:16)
Rev'd Mal Falloon (Latimer Warden)Posted by latimer at 10:57 PM | Comments (0)
The Martyrdom of Bishops Latimer and Ridley
16 October 2005 marked the 450th anniversary of the martyrdom of Bishop Hugh Latimer and Bishop Nicholas Ridley. It was Latimer who, as the faggots were lit, famously said “Be of good comfort Master Ridley, and play the man. We shall this day light such a candle by God’s grace in England as I trust shall never be put out!”.
EV News: www.evangelicals.org/news.asp?id=217
CofE Newspaper: tinyurl.com/dfser
Christian History Institute:
chi.gospelcom.net/DAILYF/2003/10/daily-10-16-2003.shtml
A Brief history:
www.tudorplace.com.ar/Bios/Latimer,Ridley,Cranmer.htm
Posted by latimer at 11:08 AM | Comments (0)
October 14, 2005
Anglican liberals attack Windsor report
Anglican discussion on homosexuality has been superficial, claimed the Archbishop of Wales, Barry Morgan, in a commendation for a new book which attacks the Windsor Report.
CofE Newspaper: http://tinyurl.com/7ljmp
Posted by latimer at 03:08 PM | Comments (0)
Staying together or walking together
What is driving the search for new relationships in the Anglican Communion? What is driving the realignment of the Communion? Why have people been leaving their current relationships in the Anglican Communion, with their parish, bishop, diocese or province? By Vinay Samuel and Chris Sugden
http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/8Oct05.html
Posted by latimer at 02:54 PM | Comments (0)